blob: 190a01003cfcae48cad172d7d0434ac3e7ec68cb (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
|
# 🎉 Architecture Investigation Complete
## Summary
I have completed a comprehensive investigation of the GRASP protocol, reference implementation, and Rust ecosystem to design the architecture for **ngit-grasp**.
## Key Finding
✅ **The `git-http-backend` Rust crate is sufficiently flexible to allow inline authorization logic**
We do NOT need Git hooks. We can intercept and validate pushes directly in the HTTP handler before spawning Git.
## Decision
**Use inline authorization** (not pre-receive hooks)
### Why This Is Better
1. **Better UX**: Direct HTTP error responses vs. parsing hook stderr
2. **Simpler Deployment**: Single Rust binary, no hook management
3. **Easier Testing**: Pure Rust unit tests, no shell scripts
4. **Better Performance**: Skip Git spawn for invalid pushes
5. **Tighter Integration**: Shared state between Git and Nostr components
## Documentation Created
### 📋 For Your Review
1. **[REVIEW_SUMMARY.md](REVIEW_SUMMARY.md)** ⭐ START HERE
- Executive summary of investigation
- Architecture decision and rationale
- Implementation roadmap
- Success criteria
### 📚 Architecture Documents
2. **[docs/ARCHITECTURE.md](docs/ARCHITECTURE.md)**
- Detailed component design with code examples
- Data flow diagrams
- Testing strategy
- Performance considerations
- ~8,000 words of detailed design
3. **[docs/DECISION_SUMMARY.md](docs/DECISION_SUMMARY.md)**
- Why inline authorization vs. hooks
- Investigation findings
- Concerns and mitigations
4. **[docs/COMPARISON.md](docs/COMPARISON.md)**
- Side-by-side comparison with ngit-relay
- Performance estimates
- When to choose each implementation
### 🔧 Technical References
5. **[docs/GIT_PROTOCOL.md](docs/GIT_PROTOCOL.md)**
- Git Smart HTTP protocol reference
- Pkt-line format explanation
- Parsing examples and code snippets
6. **[docs/GETTING_STARTED.md](docs/GETTING_STARTED.md)**
- Step-by-step implementation guide
- Development workflow
- Common issues and solutions
### 📖 Project Files
7. **[README.md](README.md)**
- Project overview
- Quick start guide
- Feature list and roadmap
8. **[docs/README.md](docs/README.md)**
- Documentation index
- Reading guide for different audiences
9. **[.env.example](.env.example)**
- Configuration template
10. **[LICENSE](LICENSE)**
- MIT License
## Architecture Overview
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ngit-grasp (Single Binary) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ actix-web HTTP Server │
│ ↓ ↓ │
│ Git Handlers Nostr Relay │
│ ↓ ↓ │
│ Inline Auth ← Query State │
│ ↓ │
│ Spawn Git (if valid) │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
## Technology Stack
- **actix-web**: HTTP server
- **git-http-backend**: Git protocol (Rust crate)
- **nostr-relay-builder**: Nostr relay (rust-nostr)
- **tokio**: Async runtime
## Implementation Estimate
- **~1,400 lines of code** (similar to reference)
- **4-6 weeks** for GRASP-01 MVP
- **Well-documented** with extensive examples
## GRASP Compliance
### GRASP-01 (MVP)
- ✅ Designed and documented
- ⏭️ Ready to implement
### GRASP-02 (Proactive Sync)
- ✅ Architecture designed
- ⏭️ Future phase
### GRASP-05 (Archive)
- ✅ Architecture designed
- ⏭️ Future phase
## Recommendation
✅ **Proceed with implementation**
The architecture is:
- Technically sound
- Pragmatic and achievable
- Superior to hook-based approach
- Well-documented
- Testable
- GRASP-compliant
## Next Steps
1. **Review** [REVIEW_SUMMARY.md](REVIEW_SUMMARY.md)
2. **Review** [docs/ARCHITECTURE.md](docs/ARCHITECTURE.md)
3. **Approve** or provide feedback on architecture
4. **Begin implementation** following [docs/GETTING_STARTED.md](docs/GETTING_STARTED.md)
## Questions?
All design decisions are documented with rationale. If you have questions or want to discuss any aspect, the documentation provides detailed context.
---
**Ready to build!** 🚀
|