|
std::thread::hardware_concurrency() reports the MACHINE's core count. Inside a
container that is the wrong number: with --cpuset-cpus 0-5 on a 12-core host it
still answers 12, and every caller that sized a pool from it oversubscribed 2x.
Measured on the pool box:
- the pool node logged "Mining with 11 thread(s) of 12 core(s)" while
confined to 6 CPUs
- a burst miner launched with /hashthreads=2 filled the ~2 GB RandomX
dataset with 12 threads, alongside the pool node in the same 8 GB container
AvailableCoreCount() asks sched_getaffinity what the cpuset actually permits,
which is the number all of these meant. It cannot make the dataset build slower:
the CPU budget is identical either way, so fewer threads on the same cores is
the same work without the thrash. Falls back to hardware_concurrency where the
call is unavailable, and never returns 0 because callers subtract from it.
Not the cause of the burst miner dying -- that was a corrupt Berkeley DB
environment in the worker datadir -- but it is why the failure landed on the
dataset build, and it is wrong on its own terms.
(cherry picked from commit b3bee16f3eef8982bff1174bd9d0a9c21473732c)
|